|
Post by Kendall on Jul 16, 2009 15:23:35 GMT -5
Knock Knock Who's there? Cows. Cows who? No they don't! They Moo!
|
|
|
Post by Kendall on Jul 16, 2009 16:21:30 GMT -5
Knock Knock Who's there? Eyesore Eyesore who? Eyesore do like you!
|
|
|
Post by Kendall on Jul 17, 2009 7:43:33 GMT -5
I feel like there aren't a lot of powerful personalities in this game. But maybe I'm just mistaken because this didn't start as a thirty-five person bull fight.
|
|
|
Post by Kendall on Jul 17, 2009 7:59:47 GMT -5
In a way, having a strong player "to the right of you" is akin to having a good hitter behind you in the lineup. Magichat posses some pretty sound mental capacities, so Worm becomes that much more dangerous because you have to worry about magichat getting the view.
|
|
|
Post by sinn on Jul 17, 2009 10:30:05 GMT -5
In a way, having a strong player "to the right of you" is akin to having a good hitter behind you in the lineup. Magichat posses some pretty sound mental capacities, so Worm becomes that much more dangerous because you have to worry about magichat getting the view. This was how I looked at it - before knowing the teams, I would have guessed I was going to die N1 to put the view in Jamy's hands. If I had been successful in getting her lynched D1, I would have felt safer with Foos behind me. As it turns out they were both BGs, and I might have been in danger either way. I still think the right way to go is to lynch the seer every day. That keeps the BGs from making themselves seer, and would actually help figure out the BGs quicker, since you know you are getting good views. The best information will always come when the seer is dead, and you know their alliance.
|
|
|
Post by Kendall on Jul 17, 2009 10:48:08 GMT -5
In a way, having a strong player "to the right of you" is akin to having a good hitter behind you in the lineup. Magichat posses some pretty sound mental capacities, so Worm becomes that much more dangerous because you have to worry about magichat getting the view. This was how I looked at it - before knowing the teams, I would have guessed I was going to die N1 to put the view in Jamy's hands. If I had been successful in getting her lynched D1, I would have felt safer with Foos behind me. As it turns out they were both BGs, and I might have been in danger either way. I still think the right way to go is to lynch the seer every day. That keeps the BGs from making themselves seer, and would actually help figure out the BGs quicker, since you know you are getting good views. The best information will always come when the seer is dead, and you know their alliance. I think I agree with you that the seer needs to be lynched through the first few game days at the least. Problems with that plan occur when if a previously viewed player becomes the seer, but I don't see the wolves letting that happen.
|
|
|
Post by Flysack on Jul 17, 2009 11:02:15 GMT -5
This was how I looked at it - before knowing the teams, I would have guessed I was going to die N1 to put the view in Jamy's hands. If I had been successful in getting her lynched D1, I would have felt safer with Foos behind me. As it turns out they were both BGs, and I might have been in danger either way. I still think the right way to go is to lynch the seer every day. That keeps the BGs from making themselves seer, and would actually help figure out the BGs quicker, since you know you are getting good views. The best information will always come when the seer is dead, and you know their alliance. I think I agree with you that the seer needs to be lynched through the first few game days at the least. Problems with that plan occur when if a previously viewed player becomes the seer, but I don't see the wolves letting that happen. I take back what I said about B-Deep. He isn't a good player pretending to be an idiot: he really is an idiot.
|
|
|
Post by Flysack on Jul 17, 2009 11:04:15 GMT -5
Either act I advocated would have put the village ahead -
Lynching Jamy would have bagged a second BG.
Forcing the next seer to view Jamy would give the village direction.
Instead, B-Deep babbles nonsense, contributes half-assed ideas, sews confusion, and does it all because he's genuinely stupid.
If he was a wolf, I'd be applauding him right not. What a dumb, dumb play.
|
|
|
Post by Kendall on Jul 17, 2009 12:13:38 GMT -5
Knock Knock Who's there? Flysack. Flysack who? Flysack dildo in your hand?
|
|
|
Post by Kendall on Jul 17, 2009 12:21:53 GMT -5
Knock Knock Who's there? Majorum. Majorum who? Majorum, the Army is still don't ask don't tell right?
|
|
|
Post by Kendall on Jul 17, 2009 13:30:13 GMT -5
Knock Knock Who's there? Funky Buttloving Funky Buttloving who? You really need to ask?
|
|
|
Post by Kendall on Jul 17, 2009 14:01:54 GMT -5
Knock Knock Who's there? Thesy Thesy who? Thesy all those FBGs are jocks
|
|
|
Post by Kendall on Jul 17, 2009 15:00:27 GMT -5
Knock Knock Who's there? Anal Periods Anal Periods who? Anal baby when I gots my Periods
|
|
|
Post by flysack on Jul 17, 2009 17:03:10 GMT -5
Funny, Kendell.
I should probably take back what I said about B-Deep.
Hindsight from the Green Room is far easier than in the game.
|
|
|
Post by tasker on Jul 20, 2009 9:33:59 GMT -5
Nah, B-Deep is a good player
I nailed Anborn too
|
|